1.

Right now it feels too automated, and not in a good way. It’s fast, but almost too forgiving. These isnt any sense of structure or standard. I can get through the whole thing in seconds and end up with something that feels empty. Also a lack of control. Splitting everything into separate steps sounds clean in theory, but in practice it just fragments the content. If I have multiple goals or challenges, forcing them into isolated steps makes the whole thing feel thin instead of cohesive. On top of that, the step routing is confusing and inconsistent. It breaks the flow instead of guiding it.

2.

No. I wouldnt send this to a high-paying client. It does not feel complete or polished enough. The lack of structure in the input shows up in the output. Even though there are a lot of design choices, the structure of the output itself, is not client-ready. It feels like a rough draft.

3.

Export is the breaking point. Forcing a print flow instead of letting me directly download a proper PDF makes this unusable in a real workflow. That alone would push me back to my current setup.

4.

It’s fast, but it does not actually save time where it matters. I still wouldnt trust the output, so I would end up reworking everything anyway. At that point, the speed advantage disappears.

5.

There isnt any sense of flexibility or variation. Everything feels predefined (styling, structure, design), both in how you write and how the result looks. That makes it hard to adapt it to anything that feels personal or aligned with how I would actually present myself.